<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 01:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on General paralysis of the insane* and psychiatry&#8217;s only Nobel Prize by George</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/general-paralysis-of-the-insane-and-psychiatrys-only-nobel-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-539042</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 01:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/general-paralysis-of-the-insane-and-psychiatrys-only-nobel-prize/#comment-539042</guid>
		<description>Lenin was already syphilitic when he arrived in Russia from Germany.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lenin was already syphilitic when he arrived in Russia from Germany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Institute of Psychoanalysis event by Silia</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/institute-of-psychoanalysis-event/comment-page-1/#comment-539023</link>
		<dc:creator>Silia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 23:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/?p=1622#comment-539023</guid>
		<description>good one, but I&#039;m not gotta go. ah, that was just slip of a tongue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good one, but I&#8217;m not gotta go. ah, that was just slip of a tongue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatric disorders of the rich and famous #1 Howard Hughes by Evelin</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/psychiatric-disorders-of-the-rich-and-famous-1-howard-hughes/comment-page-1/#comment-537564</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/?p=142#comment-537564</guid>
		<description>So was that man sick or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So was that man sick or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatric eponyms: Fregoli delusion by brain damaged</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/psychiatric-eponyms-fregoli-delusion/comment-page-1/#comment-537031</link>
		<dc:creator>brain damaged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/?p=1569#comment-537031</guid>
		<description>nohing to worry about, I hardly recognize even well known faces when removed from their standard environment; people think I&#039;m being rude, but I swear, I just don&#039;t recognize them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nohing to worry about, I hardly recognize even well known faces when removed from their standard environment; people think I&#8217;m being rude, but I swear, I just don&#8217;t recognize them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Psychiatry on the web by Dr Mike Smith</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/psychiatry-on-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-533988</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/psychiatry-on-the-web/#comment-533988</guid>
		<description>Hi,

We would be grateful if you would review our website, www.mrcpsychmentor.com, and consider adding it to your list of resources. It offers a high standard of exam preparation for the written papers at a very reasonable price.

Many thanks

Dr Mike Smith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>We would be grateful if you would review our website, <a href="http://www.mrcpsychmentor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mrcpsychmentor.com</a>, and consider adding it to your list of resources. It offers a high standard of exam preparation for the written papers at a very reasonable price.</p>
<p>Many thanks</p>
<p>Dr Mike Smith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can incarceration be thought of as disease? by Susanna</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/can-incarceration-be-thought-of-as-disease/comment-page-1/#comment-532246</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/?p=1612#comment-532246</guid>
		<description>The McCarthy Witch-hunts against communism and the fear of &quot;Reds under the Bed&quot; must have left a whole generation afraid of anything left wing or socialist. So &quot;socalised medicine&quot; is &quot;communist medicine&quot;. Perhaps that is why this generation who were born during that period are so afraid of &quot;socialist&quot; Europe - many Americans really do think that the UK is &quot;socialist&quot; and that Europe is &quot;socialist&quot;. I wonder if that is why they are encouraging the world to ditch the public sector because it might encourage &quot;communism&quot; and &quot;reds under the bed&quot;?

From the book &quot;Get a life&quot; by David Burke and Jean Lotus of The White Dot Campaign. Bloomsbury 1998. Chapter 9: 

Brandon Centerwall, an epidemiologist, did a study on homicide rates for two industrialised countries where TV arrived late, controlling for urbanisation and how easy it was to obtain arms. He found that after a ten year lag, while the first television generation came of age, murder rates went up. He published the findings in the 1993 issue of The Public Interest. He wrote: &quot;If, hypothetically, television technology had never been developed ..[in the United States]... violent crime would be half what it is.&quot; 

South Africa did not have television until 1973. Centerwall compared white homicide rates for the US, Canada and South Africa and he found that from 1945 to 1974, the white homicide rate in the US increased 93%. In Canada the homicide rate increased 93%. In South Africa where television was banned until 1973, the white homicide rate declined by 7%. Centerwall also tracked murder rates across the US: as different regions got television, after a 10-15 year gap, violent crime doubled and the same thing appeared to happen in Canda. He found that in England and Wales, the homicide rate doubled about 15 years after television became widespread. In South Africa, 8 years after television was introduced, the white homicide rates became equivalent to the rest of the Western world. Centerwall thinks that the fifteen year period is the time it takes for the first television generation to &quot;come of age&quot;. 

At a press conference of the American Medical Association in Chicago in July 1996, Centerwall presented these findings, calling TV-related violence an epidemic but it was not reported in the media at the time, although the US senate has since taken some interest. 

Leonard Eron of the University of Illinois asked prisoners about how much television they watched as kids and found that the amount of television watched at age eight was proportional to the seriousness of crimes committed by age 30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McCarthy Witch-hunts against communism and the fear of &#8220;Reds under the Bed&#8221; must have left a whole generation afraid of anything left wing or socialist. So &#8220;socalised medicine&#8221; is &#8220;communist medicine&#8221;. Perhaps that is why this generation who were born during that period are so afraid of &#8220;socialist&#8221; Europe &#8211; many Americans really do think that the UK is &#8220;socialist&#8221; and that Europe is &#8220;socialist&#8221;. I wonder if that is why they are encouraging the world to ditch the public sector because it might encourage &#8220;communism&#8221; and &#8220;reds under the bed&#8221;?</p>
<p>From the book &#8220;Get a life&#8221; by David Burke and Jean Lotus of The White Dot Campaign. Bloomsbury 1998. Chapter 9: </p>
<p>Brandon Centerwall, an epidemiologist, did a study on homicide rates for two industrialised countries where TV arrived late, controlling for urbanisation and how easy it was to obtain arms. He found that after a ten year lag, while the first television generation came of age, murder rates went up. He published the findings in the 1993 issue of The Public Interest. He wrote: &#8220;If, hypothetically, television technology had never been developed ..[in the United States]&#8230; violent crime would be half what it is.&#8221; </p>
<p>South Africa did not have television until 1973. Centerwall compared white homicide rates for the US, Canada and South Africa and he found that from 1945 to 1974, the white homicide rate in the US increased 93%. In Canada the homicide rate increased 93%. In South Africa where television was banned until 1973, the white homicide rate declined by 7%. Centerwall also tracked murder rates across the US: as different regions got television, after a 10-15 year gap, violent crime doubled and the same thing appeared to happen in Canda. He found that in England and Wales, the homicide rate doubled about 15 years after television became widespread. In South Africa, 8 years after television was introduced, the white homicide rates became equivalent to the rest of the Western world. Centerwall thinks that the fifteen year period is the time it takes for the first television generation to &#8220;come of age&#8221;. </p>
<p>At a press conference of the American Medical Association in Chicago in July 1996, Centerwall presented these findings, calling TV-related violence an epidemic but it was not reported in the media at the time, although the US senate has since taken some interest. </p>
<p>Leonard Eron of the University of Illinois asked prisoners about how much television they watched as kids and found that the amount of television watched at age eight was proportional to the seriousness of crimes committed by age 30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview with Prozacville by Prozacville</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/interview-with-prozacville/comment-page-1/#comment-525462</link>
		<dc:creator>Prozacville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/?p=1064#comment-525462</guid>
		<description>New link (or rather old link, as twas original link for PV): http://prozacville.blogspot.co.uk/

x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New link (or rather old link, as twas original link for PV): <a href="http://prozacville.blogspot.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://prozacville.blogspot.co.uk/</a></p>
<p>x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interview with writer Will Self part 2 by Mark Saxton</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/interview-with-writer-will-self-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-523135</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Saxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/?p=1606#comment-523135</guid>
		<description>There is something to discover in almost every sentence Will Self writes. He is a truth-teller like no other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something to discover in almost every sentence Will Self writes. He is a truth-teller like no other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Police and Government have a duty not to engender panic as a way of achieving their own ends&#8221; by Demetrius Skortou</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/the-police-and-government-have-a-duty-not-to-engender-panic-as-a-way-of-achieving-their-own-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-522809</link>
		<dc:creator>Demetrius Skortou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/?p=461#comment-522809</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir/Madam,

I&#039;m not sure whether you would be interested in what has been going on over our skies now for at least 9 years. Below are several E-Mails sent to various individuals, including David Miliband (leader of the Labour Party) and an article about these unmarked surveillance aircraft in the Telegraph, which have been flying around in circles, for 18 hours a day, over our estate for 9 years now.

No one in authority, seems to know why these unmarked aircraft have chosen our area, for all this surveillance.

I&#039;ve read your article on this new Police DNA database. I bet that soon all this information, will suddenly dissapear, into some overseas database.

Acts of terrorism, have brought rich rewards, for both the police &amp; intelligence services.

Yours Sincerely,

 
Demetrius Skortou

 
E-MAIL TO DAVID MILLIBAND

 

Dear Mr Miliband,

 

So, the government want to give even more powers to the security services to spy on anyone they like, how convenient. Terrorism has been a gift, to the intelligence services. The new laws, rules &amp; regulations, have allowed these faceless people to intrude into all our personal lives, and the government doesn&#039;t have to confirm nor deny whether someone is under surveillance either. The established order of this country don&#039;t really care about acts of terrorism, if they did, the government would not allow so many people to pass through our border controls, so easy!

 

Consider the E-Mail &amp; the Telegraph article below. For 9 years I have sent over 300 e-mails to every newspaper, relevant government dept, Prime Ministers offices, Home Secretaries (that didn&#039;t seem to last long every time I wrote to them about these mysterious unmarked aircraft) Southwark Council, Valerie Shawcross MP, James Cleverly (who sits on the London assembly) Liberty, HACAN - Clear Skies, CAA, NATS, Simon Hughes MP for Southwark/Bermondsey and the MOD. I have come up against a brick wall of silence over this matter. It seems no one in authority or the press &amp; media are the least bit interested in these commercial passenger type aircraft, that are actually being used as surveillance aircraft. These unmarked aircraft/helicopters have been flying constantly around our estate of Tabard Gardens, SE1 for at least 9 years now, causing so much unnecessary levels of noise &amp; pollution, from 6:00am until 11:00pm at night..........why? 





Yours Sincerely,

 



Demetrius Skortou
 









MY E-MAIL

 

I&#039;m not sure whether this E-mail will interest you. However, after reading an article of a white unmarked jet flying over New York on 9/11, I thought you may be interested in the article I sent below to our Local Police Authority, at the London Mayors Office at Tower Bridge, South London. 

As you can see from the article below, the residents of a South London apartment block have had to endure the constant noise/pollution flights of these unmarked commercial passenger type aircraft, that have been flying around our estate, for nearly 9 years now. The British government have been keeping a tight lip about all of this. 

The question is, why would the intelligence services use unmarked passenger jets to just fly around in circles, for 18 hours a day? And why was their a similar white unmarked passenger jet, circling around New York City, the same day that both Twin Towers, were destroyed...by Al-Qaeda? 


Yours Sincerely,
 

Demetrius Skortou

 







THE TELEGRAPH ARTICLE

 

The Metropolitan Police has secret spy planes capable of eavesdropping on mobile phone calls from the sky.


The existence of the fleet of planes - each costing at least £3 million to purchase and hundreds of thousands more to operate - has never been publicly disclosed.
The police have being using the planes since at least 1997.


The disclosure of the spending, which is not detailed in official accounts, comes as the police face 20 per cent cuts in their budget, creating fears that hundreds of support staff will lose their jobs and the number of officers reduced. 


Despite the cuts the Met&#039;s secret fixed wing aircraft fleet is still flying regular sorties over London from a base at Farnborough airfield, in Hampshire.
The planes have apparently been fitted with secret surveillance equipment capable of intercepting mobile phone calls or eavesdropping on conversations.


They are understood to be similar to surveillance planes available to MI5 which have been used in anti-terrorism operations and were used to help West Midlands Police track suspects connected to a plot to kidnap and behead a British Muslim soldier. 


One of the planes is a Cessna F04, which can carry up to 14 passengers or be fitted with specially integrated patrol mission packs. We have been asked not to disclose full details of the aircraft on security grounds.
The twin engine craft are operated separately from the Met&#039;s Air Support Unit which has three helicopters and flies hundreds of hours a month in support of police operations around the capital at a cost of £3 million a year.
Last week a Metropolitan Police spokesman refused to discuss its use of the fixed wing aircraft but insisted it has gone through a &quot;full&quot; procurement process.


However members of the Metropolitan Police Authority, which scrutinises the force&#039;s spending said they had never been told of the existence of the aircraft.
According to Civil Aviation Authority records, the aircraft is registered to a firm called Nor Leasing.


There is no trace of the firm on any other official record and its business address registered with the CAA is actually a branch of Mail Boxes Etc, which offers a virtual office services and mail forwarding, in Surbiton, south-west London. 


Another Cessna was also previously registered to Nor Leasing at the same address and at another service address in Kensington, west London.
In 1997 one of the original individuals listed as &quot;trading as&quot; Nor Leasing was John Carnt who at the time was a senior Metropolitan Police detective.
Superintendent Carnt was the then head of the Serious and Economic Crime Group, which was set up to combat major fraud, money laundering and art and antiques thefts.


The pattern of hidden spending is believed to have been established by Tony Williams, a former assistant finance director at Scotland Yard, who established a secret web of companies for use in specialist undercover operations.
But Mr Williams also used the same techniques to steal millions of pounds from the force to set himself up as a bogus Scottish &quot;laird&quot;. Williams was accused of stealing more than £4 million from Scotland Yard. He was jailed for seven years in 1995. 


Metropolitan Police Authority member James Cleverly last night said he was totally unaware that the Met had any fixed wing aircraft.
Mr Cleverly, who also sits on the authority&#039;s counter terrorism and protective services committee, which examines the force&#039;s covert work, said: &quot;This is not something that I have been made aware of or have had the opportunity to scrutinise. 


&quot;In the light of the tight financial situation we are facing and the cuts being imposed on the police service it is imperative that we examine any assets that could be construed as a &#039;luxury&#039;.
&quot;I would expect full disclosure of details of this to the MPA to enable us to examine whether it represents good value for money for the police service.&quot;

Mark Demery
Head of External Relations
LONDONASSEMBLY
CITY HALL
THE QUEEN&#039;S WALK
LONDON
SE1 2AA
020 7983 5769
07973 191 635 

Visit the London Assembly website:www.london.gov.uk/assembly
Follow us on Twitter: @LondonAssembly
Follow us on Facebook: London Assembly



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 



ARTICLE I SENT TO THE LONDON MAYORS OFFICE

 

Dear Sir/Madam,
 
I have written to the London Mayors Office, the Prime Minister &amp; many other institutions/organisations, about these large &amp; smaller unmarked aircraft/helicopters, that have been flying low, around
in circles, over our estate, from 6:30 until 11:00pm at night, for nearly 9 years now.
 
All I have encountered, is a government wall of silence, over this matter. How can these huge commercial type aircraft (which are obviously being used has spy/surveillance aircraft) be allowed to constantly wake local residents up, every day, for nearly 9 years?
 
Exactly, how much has this really cost the British tax payers? According to a recent Telegraph article regarding these mysterious unmarked aircraft, the Met would only admit to just 3 aircraft, that they have been flying around London since, 1997. However, I have counted over 20 different types of unmarked aircraft/helicopters, including 4 main commercial type passenger aircraft, that have been used since 1997. they are; 2 x 727&#039;s, 737, &amp; a 747 passenger type planes. These particular aircraft are flying low over Tabard Gardens &amp; toward London&#039;s Heathrow Airport. However, these unmarked aircraft are not flying to Heathrow or any other airport, all they are doing, is just going around in circles, over our estate, for 18 hours a day. How in gods name can this be justified? Who is paying for all these aircraft to just fly around in circles, for 18 hours a day?
 
I am not getting any answers, from any of you in authority. Who, within this government, gave authorisation for these noisy/polluting planes to fly around our estate, constantly waking up local residents, every day, including every weekend? With all the cutbacks, the Met Police are going to be facing (simply, because the Government/EU eventually want a smaller European type police force) massive cuts in their budget. How, therefore, can the government/intelligence services, justify this kind of lavish spending on these types of aircraft. Or, is it, that an American military organisation are mostly funding these costly surveillance procedures, that a local resident told me only the other day? 

I am writing to everyone in the media. I will not stop until I get some answers, from all of you within the government. I know the security forces have to protect our citizens from possible terrorist activities. However, can&#039;t they just be satisfied with using just a couple of helicopters, packed with their eavesdropping equipment? Why are the intelligence services using these huge commercial type passenger aircraft, that are so noisy as well as create so much more unnecessary levels of pollution, over our estate? This is totally bizarre!
 
Because of the unusual nature of this situation, we at Tabard Gardens Estate Community Residents, demand a proper public enquiry into this matter, for the first time in nearly 9 years, come April. I am also sure, the British people/taxpayers will &amp; eventually get to know, exactly how much these hugely expensive, aircraft are costing &amp; who in government, authorised all of this.
 
Local residents, are sick to the back teeth of being woken up at early hours of the mornings, by these huge unmarked aircraft. All of this has become intolerable, to all the residents of Tabard Gardens. We will eventually be sending a letter, to her Majesty the Queen and the whole of the media. Quite frankly, the residents of Tabard have had enough.
 
If these aircraft were genuine commercial type passenger aircraft, going into Heathrow, then we would just have to put up with it all. But, these unmarked planes (that are not even registered with the CAA nor The NATS) are not commercial aircraft.......they are spy planes!
 
I will await your earliest reply,
 

Yours Sincerely,
 

Demetrius Skortou</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir/Madam,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether you would be interested in what has been going on over our skies now for at least 9 years. Below are several E-Mails sent to various individuals, including David Miliband (leader of the Labour Party) and an article about these unmarked surveillance aircraft in the Telegraph, which have been flying around in circles, for 18 hours a day, over our estate for 9 years now.</p>
<p>No one in authority, seems to know why these unmarked aircraft have chosen our area, for all this surveillance.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read your article on this new Police DNA database. I bet that soon all this information, will suddenly dissapear, into some overseas database.</p>
<p>Acts of terrorism, have brought rich rewards, for both the police &amp; intelligence services.</p>
<p>Yours Sincerely,</p>
<p>Demetrius Skortou</p>
<p>E-MAIL TO DAVID MILLIBAND</p>
<p>Dear Mr Miliband,</p>
<p>So, the government want to give even more powers to the security services to spy on anyone they like, how convenient. Terrorism has been a gift, to the intelligence services. The new laws, rules &amp; regulations, have allowed these faceless people to intrude into all our personal lives, and the government doesn&#8217;t have to confirm nor deny whether someone is under surveillance either. The established order of this country don&#8217;t really care about acts of terrorism, if they did, the government would not allow so many people to pass through our border controls, so easy!</p>
<p>Consider the E-Mail &amp; the Telegraph article below. For 9 years I have sent over 300 e-mails to every newspaper, relevant government dept, Prime Ministers offices, Home Secretaries (that didn&#8217;t seem to last long every time I wrote to them about these mysterious unmarked aircraft) Southwark Council, Valerie Shawcross MP, James Cleverly (who sits on the London assembly) Liberty, HACAN &#8211; Clear Skies, CAA, NATS, Simon Hughes MP for Southwark/Bermondsey and the MOD. I have come up against a brick wall of silence over this matter. It seems no one in authority or the press &amp; media are the least bit interested in these commercial passenger type aircraft, that are actually being used as surveillance aircraft. These unmarked aircraft/helicopters have been flying constantly around our estate of Tabard Gardens, SE1 for at least 9 years now, causing so much unnecessary levels of noise &amp; pollution, from 6:00am until 11:00pm at night&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.why? </p>
<p>Yours Sincerely,</p>
<p>Demetrius Skortou</p>
<p>MY E-MAIL</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether this E-mail will interest you. However, after reading an article of a white unmarked jet flying over New York on 9/11, I thought you may be interested in the article I sent below to our Local Police Authority, at the London Mayors Office at Tower Bridge, South London. </p>
<p>As you can see from the article below, the residents of a South London apartment block have had to endure the constant noise/pollution flights of these unmarked commercial passenger type aircraft, that have been flying around our estate, for nearly 9 years now. The British government have been keeping a tight lip about all of this. </p>
<p>The question is, why would the intelligence services use unmarked passenger jets to just fly around in circles, for 18 hours a day? And why was their a similar white unmarked passenger jet, circling around New York City, the same day that both Twin Towers, were destroyed&#8230;by Al-Qaeda? </p>
<p>Yours Sincerely,</p>
<p>Demetrius Skortou</p>
<p>THE TELEGRAPH ARTICLE</p>
<p>The Metropolitan Police has secret spy planes capable of eavesdropping on mobile phone calls from the sky.</p>
<p>The existence of the fleet of planes &#8211; each costing at least £3 million to purchase and hundreds of thousands more to operate &#8211; has never been publicly disclosed.<br />
The police have being using the planes since at least 1997.</p>
<p>The disclosure of the spending, which is not detailed in official accounts, comes as the police face 20 per cent cuts in their budget, creating fears that hundreds of support staff will lose their jobs and the number of officers reduced. </p>
<p>Despite the cuts the Met&#8217;s secret fixed wing aircraft fleet is still flying regular sorties over London from a base at Farnborough airfield, in Hampshire.<br />
The planes have apparently been fitted with secret surveillance equipment capable of intercepting mobile phone calls or eavesdropping on conversations.</p>
<p>They are understood to be similar to surveillance planes available to MI5 which have been used in anti-terrorism operations and were used to help West Midlands Police track suspects connected to a plot to kidnap and behead a British Muslim soldier. </p>
<p>One of the planes is a Cessna F04, which can carry up to 14 passengers or be fitted with specially integrated patrol mission packs. We have been asked not to disclose full details of the aircraft on security grounds.<br />
The twin engine craft are operated separately from the Met&#8217;s Air Support Unit which has three helicopters and flies hundreds of hours a month in support of police operations around the capital at a cost of £3 million a year.<br />
Last week a Metropolitan Police spokesman refused to discuss its use of the fixed wing aircraft but insisted it has gone through a &#8220;full&#8221; procurement process.</p>
<p>However members of the Metropolitan Police Authority, which scrutinises the force&#8217;s spending said they had never been told of the existence of the aircraft.<br />
According to Civil Aviation Authority records, the aircraft is registered to a firm called Nor Leasing.</p>
<p>There is no trace of the firm on any other official record and its business address registered with the CAA is actually a branch of Mail Boxes Etc, which offers a virtual office services and mail forwarding, in Surbiton, south-west London. </p>
<p>Another Cessna was also previously registered to Nor Leasing at the same address and at another service address in Kensington, west London.<br />
In 1997 one of the original individuals listed as &#8220;trading as&#8221; Nor Leasing was John Carnt who at the time was a senior Metropolitan Police detective.<br />
Superintendent Carnt was the then head of the Serious and Economic Crime Group, which was set up to combat major fraud, money laundering and art and antiques thefts.</p>
<p>The pattern of hidden spending is believed to have been established by Tony Williams, a former assistant finance director at Scotland Yard, who established a secret web of companies for use in specialist undercover operations.<br />
But Mr Williams also used the same techniques to steal millions of pounds from the force to set himself up as a bogus Scottish &#8220;laird&#8221;. Williams was accused of stealing more than £4 million from Scotland Yard. He was jailed for seven years in 1995. </p>
<p>Metropolitan Police Authority member James Cleverly last night said he was totally unaware that the Met had any fixed wing aircraft.<br />
Mr Cleverly, who also sits on the authority&#8217;s counter terrorism and protective services committee, which examines the force&#8217;s covert work, said: &#8220;This is not something that I have been made aware of or have had the opportunity to scrutinise. </p>
<p>&#8220;In the light of the tight financial situation we are facing and the cuts being imposed on the police service it is imperative that we examine any assets that could be construed as a &#8216;luxury&#8217;.<br />
&#8220;I would expect full disclosure of details of this to the MPA to enable us to examine whether it represents good value for money for the police service.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mark Demery<br />
Head of External Relations<br />
LONDONASSEMBLY<br />
CITY HALL<br />
THE QUEEN&#8217;S WALK<br />
LONDON<br />
SE1 2AA<br />
020 7983 5769<br />
07973 191 635 </p>
<p>Visit the London Assembly website:www.london.gov.uk/assembly<br />
Follow us on Twitter: @LondonAssembly<br />
Follow us on Facebook: London Assembly</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>ARTICLE I SENT TO THE LONDON MAYORS OFFICE</p>
<p>Dear Sir/Madam,</p>
<p>I have written to the London Mayors Office, the Prime Minister &amp; many other institutions/organisations, about these large &amp; smaller unmarked aircraft/helicopters, that have been flying low, around<br />
in circles, over our estate, from 6:30 until 11:00pm at night, for nearly 9 years now.</p>
<p>All I have encountered, is a government wall of silence, over this matter. How can these huge commercial type aircraft (which are obviously being used has spy/surveillance aircraft) be allowed to constantly wake local residents up, every day, for nearly 9 years?</p>
<p>Exactly, how much has this really cost the British tax payers? According to a recent Telegraph article regarding these mysterious unmarked aircraft, the Met would only admit to just 3 aircraft, that they have been flying around London since, 1997. However, I have counted over 20 different types of unmarked aircraft/helicopters, including 4 main commercial type passenger aircraft, that have been used since 1997. they are; 2 x 727&#8217;s, 737, &amp; a 747 passenger type planes. These particular aircraft are flying low over Tabard Gardens &amp; toward London&#8217;s Heathrow Airport. However, these unmarked aircraft are not flying to Heathrow or any other airport, all they are doing, is just going around in circles, over our estate, for 18 hours a day. How in gods name can this be justified? Who is paying for all these aircraft to just fly around in circles, for 18 hours a day?</p>
<p>I am not getting any answers, from any of you in authority. Who, within this government, gave authorisation for these noisy/polluting planes to fly around our estate, constantly waking up local residents, every day, including every weekend? With all the cutbacks, the Met Police are going to be facing (simply, because the Government/EU eventually want a smaller European type police force) massive cuts in their budget. How, therefore, can the government/intelligence services, justify this kind of lavish spending on these types of aircraft. Or, is it, that an American military organisation are mostly funding these costly surveillance procedures, that a local resident told me only the other day? </p>
<p>I am writing to everyone in the media. I will not stop until I get some answers, from all of you within the government. I know the security forces have to protect our citizens from possible terrorist activities. However, can&#8217;t they just be satisfied with using just a couple of helicopters, packed with their eavesdropping equipment? Why are the intelligence services using these huge commercial type passenger aircraft, that are so noisy as well as create so much more unnecessary levels of pollution, over our estate? This is totally bizarre!</p>
<p>Because of the unusual nature of this situation, we at Tabard Gardens Estate Community Residents, demand a proper public enquiry into this matter, for the first time in nearly 9 years, come April. I am also sure, the British people/taxpayers will &amp; eventually get to know, exactly how much these hugely expensive, aircraft are costing &amp; who in government, authorised all of this.</p>
<p>Local residents, are sick to the back teeth of being woken up at early hours of the mornings, by these huge unmarked aircraft. All of this has become intolerable, to all the residents of Tabard Gardens. We will eventually be sending a letter, to her Majesty the Queen and the whole of the media. Quite frankly, the residents of Tabard have had enough.</p>
<p>If these aircraft were genuine commercial type passenger aircraft, going into Heathrow, then we would just have to put up with it all. But, these unmarked planes (that are not even registered with the CAA nor The NATS) are not commercial aircraft&#8230;&#8230;.they are spy planes!</p>
<p>I will await your earliest reply,</p>
<p>Yours Sincerely,</p>
<p>Demetrius Skortou</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact Frontier Psychiatrist by Nicky Allen</title>
		<link>http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/contact-frontier-psychiatrist/comment-page-1/#comment-517043</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/?page_id=139#comment-517043</guid>
		<description>Dear Webmaster (Frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk),

I just visited your site &quot;http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/&quot; and want to congratulate you for providing very useful information. 

I recently started a website &quot;http://www.dependentpersonalitydisorder.org/&quot; that provides information regarding Dependent Personality Disorder. I invite you to visit my site and your comments will be appreciated. 

If you like the content on my site I was wondering if you&#039;d be interested in exchanging links. It would be my pleasure to add your site on my website’s resources page &quot;http://www.dependentpersonalitydisorder.org/resources.php&quot;.

Thanks for spending your valuable to read my mail.


Best Regards
Nicky Allen
Dependentpersonalitydisorder.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Webmaster (Frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk),</p>
<p>I just visited your site &#8220;http://frontierpsychiatrist.co.uk/&#8221; and want to congratulate you for providing very useful information. </p>
<p>I recently started a website &#8220;http://www.dependentpersonalitydisorder.org/&#8221; that provides information regarding Dependent Personality Disorder. I invite you to visit my site and your comments will be appreciated. </p>
<p>If you like the content on my site I was wondering if you&#8217;d be interested in exchanging links. It would be my pleasure to add your site on my website’s resources page &#8220;http://www.dependentpersonalitydisorder.org/resources.php&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thanks for spending your valuable to read my mail.</p>
<p>Best Regards<br />
Nicky Allen<br />
Dependentpersonalitydisorder.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

