in Drugs and drugs policy, Opinion pieces

“Let’s fix Britain’s drinking problem”



The former president of Brazil, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, said last week that the war on drugs had failed and that there was a need for a new global strategy concerning illegal drug use with a shift toward decriminalisation. Although progress is glacial, his sentiments do appear to reflect a growing change in attitudes, the most concrete example of which has been Portugal’s 2001 decriminalisation of all drugs, giving it the most relaxed drug laws in the European Union.

Portugal’s move has not led to nightmare scenarios of out-of-control drug use or “drug tourism” and has allowed Portuguese healthcare to more effectively offer treatment programmes to its citizens. Should Portugal’s move become a trend, a future UK government may be tempted to follow suit. However, before taking steps that may increase the ease with which currently illegal substances may be possessed and consumed, the will must be found to tackle our crisis of excess alcohol use, a drug that is already legal and widely available.

Many people use alcohol moderately and sensibly. However, millions of us do not. The harm alcohol causes is so broad that it is hard to adequately summarise it. The problems with health and public disorder are well documented, but more invisible is the toll it takes on relationships and mental health. It affects young and old; today an article in the Lancet identifies alcohol as a major factor in teenage mortality.

Despite this, the government’s attitude towards alcohol use has been predominantly soft-touch and we have seen a relaxation of licensing laws as well as local councils that appear to think nothing of allowing so many bars in certain high streets that they become a virtual no-go area to all but the most intoxicated. The large commercial concerns that produce and sell alcohol have been allowed to go about their business largely unchecked and alcohol use is widely encouraged by virtually unrestricted advertising and pricing practice. Also unhelpful is the socially corrosive veneration of alcohol-related culture that is displayed by some influential institutions, including student unions and some radio stations, whose shows regularly encourage people to relate stories of alcoholic excess.

Decisive action is needed towards curbing alcohol misuse. A report this week from the BMA calls for alcohol advertising to be banned and for the trend of music festival tie-ins to be similarly prohibited. A reduction in the density of licensed premises in town centres is also recommended.

Alcohol pricing must more accurately reflect its cost to society with the introduction of minimum prices for alcoholic drinks. More broadly, public opinion makers need to become aware of the effects of the attitudes they propagate and on this issue seek to lead rather than follow. There is cause to be optimistic: the realignment of attitudes toward drink-driving and smoking in public places shows that major shifts in policy and public perceptions on drug-related issues are possible and can take place relatively quickly.


The case for legalising all drugs is unanswerable 13 September 2009

It’s time for a U-turn on drugs 14 September 2009 about the report Zero Base Policy


Addendum 16 September 2009

New Scientist 15 September 2009 Blueprint for a better world: legalise drugs



Update 6 January 2019

Broken links fixed – I can’t see that things have moved on much in the past 10 years…

Write a Comment


  1. Surely your cover was only blown at the point you also posted it to your blog?

    Anyway, whilst I agree with much of the sentiment, I’m not sure I follow the argument. The loss of the war on drugs is a good example of how over regulation (admittedly to the point of prohibition) doesn’t work, whereas efforts to restrict the excesses of alcohol require greater regulation?

  2. I read this on the Guardian website first, and was so impressed that i sent it on to my dad to read (as i know that he has similar opinions). I didn’t know it was written by you until i came here just now! What a wonderful coincidence 🙂
    It’s a fantastic piece. Full agreement.

  3. There’s a page on the Guardian website linking my name to this blog. But you’re right, if I hadn’t mentioned it above most people would be none the wiser…

  4. I think your article is very good – I agree with it.

    I’m surprised how many of the comments disagreed though. It’s sad that a lot of people are so attached to getting out of their head that they feel the need to claim it as a right.

  5. Thanks for the post. My opinion of where we are falling down is by not discussing the real issue here – the issue is alcohol. It is a primary problem. We blame the reason our kids are dying in traffic accidents on speed. We fail to acknowledge how often drinking plays a role in these unnecessary deaths. We think not opening a liquor store in Savannah is one solution to the problem. This reminds me of a clinical psychologist I once knew who had no experience in dealing with alcohol and drugs. She suggested the drinker drive down another street so he wouldn’t go past his usual pub. Like there’s not another pub on the next street?


  • “A muddled moral and political agenda” « September 21, 2009

    […] The debate on drug legalization appears, as Professor Nutt has found, to be almost uniquely charged.  The reasons for this are complex but perhaps are rooted in drug use’s consequences being, at worst, easy fodder for any right wing commentator: people enjoying themselves, youth running amok and slothful hippies; successive governments have run scared from sections of the popular press that purport to represent the attitudes of the public.  It is reasonable to be very wary of drugs as some, but not all, of them have the potential to do great harm but our current debate is distorted and muddled and the focus on illegal drugs in isolation blinds to the damage currently visited by the excess use of alcohol. […]